LIBYA 25/08/2011 - LA GUERRA DE LIBIA RECIEN COMIENZA: MILLONES EN EL MUNDO Y EN AUXILIO DEL PUEBLO LIBIO

LA GUERRA DE LIBIA RECIEN COMIENZA:

...MILLONES EN EL MUNDO Y EN AUXILIO DEL PUEBLO LIBIO Y SUS PETICIONES Y SUS PRERROGATIVAS EN JUSTO DERECHO, HACEMOS UN LLAMADO DE RECOMPENSA PARA ADDEL JALIL, REPRESENTANTE DEL CNT Y A CADA UNO DE SU SEQUITO. EL PUEBLO LIBRE, DEMOCRATICO Y LEAL DE LIBIA SE COMPROMETE A PAGAR POR ESTA RATA TRAIDORA Y CUALQUIER OTRA, SEA VIVO O MUERTO. Y POR LAS SIGUIENTES ATENUANTES:

-1) الإبادة الجماعية!، 2) تدمير ونهب ليبيا!، 3)العرقية التطهير!، 4) دخول الارهابيين والمرتزقةللترهيب ، وسرقة واغتصاب! 5)دعوة مفتوحة للاغتيالات السياسية والاحتلال! 6) منحة مفتوحة منأصول ليبية والمواردمن الدول الأجنبية والشركات!، 7) الخيانة والتجسس ! قوى الشر الأجنبية، 8)مؤامرة أدت إلى التطورات في أزمة -- وكاذبة تقارير وسائل الاعلام من عمليات القتل على يدالقناصةحلف شمال الاطلسي لمواطنين ليبيين -- إلقاء اللوم على الحكومة وزعزعة الاستقراروجلبقرار كاذبة 9) الرعب والوحشية! قتل المدنيين والسجناء، 10) اغتصاب وحشيوقتل النساء --! بمنفيهم الأطفال، 11) للحصول على أي دولة أخرى معروفة وغير معروفة حتى جرائم المتمردينوالمرتزقة والارهابيين ومنظمة حلف شمال الأطلسي (أنهاتتحمل المسؤولية عن جميع أعضاءالمجلس من الفئران! -- الملك لا سيما -- الجرذ)!!! نفعل ذلك! أعلنت جوائز لهؤلاء الارهابيينوالخونة والعملاء! دعونا يشعرون بأنهم مهددون.... حتى المتمردين!!!!!!!!

Spanish Traslate:

Cargos -1) GENOCIDIO!, 2) la destrucción y saqueo de Libia!, 3) limpieza étnica!, 4) la entrada de terroristas y mercenarios para aterrorizar, robar y la violación! 5) Convocatoria de asesinatos políticos y la ocupación! 6) una donación libre de los bienes libios y los recursos de los países extranjeros y corporaciones!, 7) por traición y espionaje ! exterior las fuerzas del mal, 8) La asociación llevó todevelopments en la crisis - y los informes de los medios de comunicación falsa de los asesinatos cometidos por francotiradores de la OTAN a los ciudadanos libios - a culpar al gobierno y desestabilizar y traer falsa resolución 9) el terror y el asesinato brutal de civiles y prisioneros,! 10) Brutal violación y asesinato de mujeres - en particular los niños, 11) para cualquier otro conocido y notknown a los crímenes de los insurgentes, terroristas, mercenarios y de la OTAN (que tienen la responsabilidad de todos los miembros de la Junta de ratas -! especialmente el rey - Rata) ! ¡Hazlo! anuncia premios para estos traidores, andpuppets terroristas! Vamos a sentirse amenazados .... incluso los rebeldes !!!!!

Ingles Traslate:

1) GENOCIDE!, 2) the destruction and pillaging of Libya!, 3) ethnic cleansing!, 4) entry of terrorists and mercenaries to terrorize, rob and rape! 5) Open call for political assassinations and occupation! 6) an open donation of Libyan assets and resources of foreign countries and corporations!, 7) treason and spying foreign evil forces!, 8) Conspiracy led todevelopments in the crisis - and false media reports of killings by NATO snipers Libyan citizens to - to blame the government and destabilizing and bringing false resolution! 9) terror and brutal killings of civilians and prisoners!, 10) Brutal rape and murder of women - including children !!! , 11) for any other known and notknown unto crimes insurgents, terrorists, mercenaries and NATO (they bear responsibility for all members of the Board of rats)! Do it! Announced awards for these traitors, terrorists andpuppets! Let's feel threatened .... even the rebels!!!!!

Libye 2011: Plan de paix de l’Union africaine - l’OTAN refuse la démocratie!

Il existe une solution pacifique en Libye. Il s'agit d'un plan de paix proposé par l'Union africaine. Kadhafi a accepté ce plan ; la France, l'Angleterre, les USA et les rebelles l'ont rejeté. Pourquoi ? Son contenu est pourtant pleinement démocratique et son application permettrait une vraie protection des civils, conformément à la résolution de l'ONU servant de justification à la guerre.

Propositions de l'Union africaine¹ :

1. Un cessez-le-feu immédiat.
2. L'envoi d'observateurs internationaux pour vérifier que le cessez-le-feu est respecté.
3. La création d’un gouvernement de transition comprenant des membres du CNT et du gouvernement actuel.
4. La mise en place de réformes démocratiques.
5. La tenue d'élections pour que le peuple puisse choisir ses dirigeants.

Selon l'Union africaine, Kadhafi a accepté ces propositions et assuré qu'il ne ferait pas partie du «  processus de négociation². » Pourquoi donc les pays de l'OTAN refusent-ils de s'engager sur la voie de la négociation ? Pourquoi les médias occidentaux ne nous informent-ils pas du contenu réel des propositions de l'Union africaine ? Pourquoi aucun parti en France et en Belgique ne fait campagne pour la paix, alors qu'une solution pacifique existe ? De quoi s'interroger sur les buts véritables de la guerre, le rôle des médias et celui de nos dirigeants.

Notes

1. Voir : « Décision sur le règlement pacifique de la crise libyenne », communiqué de presse, session extraordinaire de la conférence de l'Union sur l'état de la paix et de la sécurité en Afrique, Addis Abeba, 25 mai 2011.
2. Communiqué de presse de l'UA, Malabo, 1er juillet 2011.

Source : michelcollon.info

Libya/Neocolonialism: After rebels captured his compound, Gaddafi remains defiant and unfazed

Gaddafi after his compound was destroyed by 64 NATO air strikes: "We are resisting with all our strength... we will either win or become martyrs."

By Madison Ruppert

No matter what your political persuasion or opinion of Libyan leader Muammar al-Gaddafi, you have to give him this: he sure is persistent and resilient.

Earlier today crashed through the gates of Gaddafi’s Tripoli compound, Bab al-Aziziya and quickly engaged in widespread looting and celebration which was quickly captured by the media and displayed across the world.

However, a victory is still not in sight for the rebels. As they have since the first weeks of the uprising, the opposition pretends this to be the case, along with much of the media and Western officials.

In reality, Gaddafi still has not been captured, nor has his son Saif al-Islam.

Even the compound of Bab al-Aziziya itself has yet to be completely won over by the rebels, with loyalist fighters still remaining throughout the compound and the city of Tripoli itself.

While the rebels have actually only made a symbolic and strategic victory, and not a total victory as people had expected, they did manage to make off with Gaddafi’s golf cart, furs and weapons.

The mainstream media coverage of the conquering of the Bab al-Aziziya compound has been confused to say the least.

While Gaddafi and his family have yet to be captured, some are characterizing this as “the most conclusive evidence yet that Colonel Gaddafi’s rule was at an end”.

Gaddafi has confirmed that he is still indeed alive and kicking, still standing in defiance of the Western-backed rebels and the NATO imperialists that have been bombing Libya into the Stone Age for months on end.

In a statement to a Tripoli-based radio station, Gaddafi characterized his retreat as a “tactical move” and has vowed to resist “the aggression with all strength” until he achieves either victory or martyrdom.

Crediting the rebels for capturing Gaddafi’s Tripoli compound is a bit ludicrous, as a whopping 64 NATO airstrikes were carried out on the compound in preparation of the rebel advance.

Even the Associated Press described this large series of airstrikes as turning Gaddafi’s compound “to rubble.”

The troops in Tripoli, in the rebel leaders’ own admission, are “not under any unified command.” Indeed all of Tripoli is not even under rebel control at this point with at least two other areas still devoted to defending Gaddafi.

That being said, there are still forces loyal to Gaddafi embedded in neighborhoods which the rebels consider to be in control, with snipers firing upon rebels whenever possible.

The Rixos Hotel, in the Abu Salim neighborhood of Tripoli is housing a group of international journalists who have been trapped inside for days on end.

Some reports claim that the journalists are being held hostage, while the BBC reported on Tuesday that the Rixos Hotel was under fire, forcing journalists to take shelter inside.

Again, the information coming out of Libya is confused and at times deliberately misrepresented or completely manufactured without any semblance of truth.

The rebels have yet to explain why rebel leaders in Benghazi lied in reporting that they had captured Saif al-Islam, Gaddafi’s second son. The mainstream media is also now ignoring their claim that they also killed Muammar Gaddafi himself.

The massive egg-on-face moment occurred when Saif al-Islam freely walked into the Rixos Hotel to converse with international journalists and inform them that they had been propagandized and that his father was still standing strong inside of Tripoli.

One of the top rebel leaders, Mahmoud Jibril, attempted to explain it away by saying that it was a misunderstanding, yet he could not manage to explain why the “rumor” and “misunderstanding” were left uncorrected until it became painfully obvious that it was a complete lie with Saif al-Islam showing up at the Rixos Hotel.

Source: End the lie

Tripoli/NATO WAR: Globalist Richard Haas Calls for NATO Occupation of Libya

Or, "How the Devil Pays"
By Tony Cartalucci

The Financial Times has featured an editorial penned by Council on Foreign Relations president Richard Haas titled, "Libya Now Needs Boots on the Ground," where the arch globalist states that Libya's rebels are in no way capable of rebuilding Libya properly and will require an "international force" to maintain order. Haas breathtakingly admits that the NATO intervention to "protect civilians" was in fact a political intervention designed to bring about regime change. With NATO leading the offensive against Tripoli, a relatively calm city until now, the alleged cause of "protecting civilians" rings hollower than ever.


Photo: One of the founding fathers of Al Qaeda, Robert Gates (left) and CFR president Richard Haas (right).

Haas goes on to explain that NATO's "success" is what requires this international assistance in the predictable form of an occupation force to deal with looting, "die-hard regime supporters," and tribal war. Haas also implores Obama to reconsider his decision to rule out American boots on the ground and to do so quickly.
Of course, NATO didn't just spend the last 5 months conducting 7,000+ airstrikes on Libya to "protect civilians" and then ride off into the sunset. This was a war of conquest from the very beginning, with globalists openly declaring it would determine the "primacy of international law" over the nation-state. In fact, the initial uprising itself was gestated in Washington and London where opposition leaders were provided resources and safe-havens to conduct their sedition, with globalist stooges like Ibrahim Sahad literally sitting in front of the White House calling for NATO to bomb his homeland. NATO, its members, particularly the US, UK, and France, and the globalist corporate-financiers behind them, fully intend to rebuild Libya according to their own aspirations shoehorned into a national consensus imposed upon the Libyan people under the guise of "democracy" and "civil society." We are watching a modern empire expand its boundaries into yet another sovereign nation.

Readers may remember an April 2011 article titled "Libyan Rebels Fighting the Globalists' War" with the ever increasingly appropriate subtitle, "How the Devil Pays." In it a caption attempts to sum up Libya's future by stating, "if these rebels really think the West is going to hand them Libya and its riches, they have another thing coming. The Neo-Con arm of the globalist agenda is already seeding the ground to deal with "extremists" coming to power after the "Arab Spring" runs its course. That means Libya's oil & future will be left in the hands of NATO troops, not the Libyan people."
The article continues:
"While the dichotomy of Western politics is merely for public consumption, what each camp states publicly can be put together as a composite giving us a clearer picture of the overall globalist agenda. Neo-Conservative war monger Daniel Pipes, a PNAC signatory, CFR member, and co-conspirator in many of the darkest chapters of recent American history, was recently sharing his "doubts" over the final result of the "Arab Spring." He believes that ultimately extremists will prevail in many cases and only complicate US relations with certain countries.
Of course, Pipes most likely didn't miss the memo and is fully aware that the "Arab Spring" is a US funded gambit, one his fellow "Neo-Cons" lining the National Endowment for Democracy and the fraudulent Freedom House are admittedly involved in. At the very least, he must have picked up the New York Times and read as much. So what exactly is Pipes trying to tell us? He is saying that as soon as the Libyan rebels secure Libya, or the Muslim Brotherhood takes hold of Syria, or Yemen, or wins out in a co-opted counterrevolution against International Crisis Group stooge Mohamed ElBaradei in Egypt, the blinders Western propagandists seem to be wearing will suddenly drop and point out that indeed the globalists have installed extremists "by accident."
To rectify this, Libyan rebels will be betrayed just as quickly as Qaddafi was. They will be removed from power, and replaced by Western stooges protected by NATO ground troops, conveniently already being put on the ground in Libya, and will stay there permanently. The globalist "Neo-Con" think tank Foreign Policy Initiative has stated, "The best way to reduce the potential dangers posed by extremist infiltration is for the United States and its allies to remain engaged in Libya."
This engagement most likely will take the shape of the other unending "engagements" in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the years of cross-border raids into Pakistan. The oil money that once built water ways, public housing, and farms from Benghazi to Tripoli, will be funneled directly out of the country and into the corporate-financier's accounts. The corporate-financier oligarchs will have taken yet another nation-state down with the help of its own gullible population, and for their gullibility, they will pay for the rest of their lives, as will their children and their children's children.
To understand the full scope of the global corporate-financier oligarchy's designs toward any given nation, we must simply look back at the brazen admissions made over the intended future stemming from the outright military conquest of Iraq and Paul Bremer's (CFR) planned economic reformation of the broken nation. The Economist enumerates the "economic liberalization" of Iraq in a piece titled "Let's all go to the yard sale: If it all works out, Iraq will be a capitalist's dream:"
1. 100% ownership of Iraqi assets.
2. Full repatriation of profits.
3. Equal legal standing with local firms.
4. Foreign banks allowed to operate or buy into local banks.
5. Income and corporate taxes capped at 15%.
6. Universal tariffs slashed to 5%.
Anyone who would willfully make a deal with such people must have their discernment called into question. As Hugo Chavez of Venezuela said of Hosni Mubarak's decades of appeasing the globalists and his eventual ousting from power at the hands of US funded, trained, and supported protesters, "that's how the devil pays." Indeed it is, and it is an instructive lesson for others including the rebels of Benghazi to consider as they attempt to make their own deals with the globalists today."
And indeed, as NATO rushes through to the finish line with a spectacular display of mass-murder and mayhem in Libya, and with the rebels dancing in the streets as NATO warplanes roar overhead, the time is soon approaching for Benghazi to pay back the West for their "help."
As pundits in the duplicitous corporate media feign ignorance over the future of Libya, as if it is truly in the hands of the Libyan people as Obama cartoonishly portrayed in his latest teleprompter reading, the self-proclaimed "Transitional National Council" leader Gibril Elqarfally gave us cyrstal clear picture of Libya's future - one inspired by globalization. In a May 12, 2011 talk before the Brookings Institution, he claimed “what’s taking place is a natural product of the globalizational process that started in the mid-80′s.”
Elwarfally talks about a “new global cultural paradigm,” “new global values,” common values, shared by many “young people.” These young people, he says, are calling for human dignity, democracy, and inclusion at all levels of national government, repeating verbatim statements coming from geopolitical meddler Zbigniew Brzezinski and the myriad of US-funded NGOs that promote these “new global values.”


Photo: Libyan rebel leader Gibril Elqarfally stands before the Fortune 500-funded Brookings Institution openly declaring fealty to the globalist agenda of interdependency and subservience to a Wall Street-London international order.

....

When asked by an audience member what Libya will look like in 2025, it turns out conveniently he was part of a study by Libyan professors and “Libyan practitioners” in 2007-2008 titled “Libya: Vision 2025.” Not surprisingly, this project was conducted with input from the IMF and involved Libya’s placement within the “global scene.” Elwarfally laments that Libya’s oil reserves are limited and that the solution is a transition to a service economy. He also claims Vision 2025′s conclusion included an education shift, turning Libya into “a lake” to develop the skills of Africans to serve the needs of the European Union.

Surely Africans are eager to once again be in the service of wealthy Europeans, who at one point owned tremendous swaths of their continent, some tycoons naming entire nations after themselves in the ultimate expression of imperial megalomania. Elwarfally, a man educated in Pittsburgh, and apparently a lifelong fan of globalization, stuns us with his frank comments and his disturbing vision for the future of not only Libya, but the role it will play in directing Africa’s efforts and resources toward American and European corporate-financier interests.

While Qaddafi's comments are dismissed out of hand, a recent message sent to his followersamidst fighting in Tripoli declared, "the traitors are paving the way for the occupation forces to be deployed in Tripoli." It seems no truer words have ever been spoken and the Libyan people, including the rebels, will have no one but themselves to blame if they allow such a way to be paved.

Source

Tripoli 22/08/2011: menaces de mort sur Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya et Thierry Meyssan

Thierry Meyssan est à Tripoli depuis le 23 juin dernier. Il y a d’abord dirigé une équipe d’enquêteurs du Réseau Voltaire. Il mène depuis deux mois un travail d’information journalistique sur le conflit. Ses positions se distinguent de celles de ses confrères : il décrit la rébellion comme étant minoritaire et permettant de justifier aux yeux de l’opinion publique internationale une classique opération militaire.
Quelles que soient les positions défendues par Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya et Thierry Meyssan, leur assassinat serait inacceptable. Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya et Thierry Meyssan ne sont pas des combattants, mais des journalistes. Les personnes qui soutiennent cette guerre en pensant qu’elle est menée pour la démocratie et la liberté ne peuvent accepter qu’on assassine des journalistes.

Tripoli : le Réseau Voltaire s’inquiète des menaces de mort qui pèsent sur Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya et Thierry Meyssan
Réseau Voltaire, lundi 22 août 2011, 13h20 GMT –

Le Réseau Voltaire s’inquiète des menaces qui pèsent sur deux de ses collaborateurs à Tripoli. Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya, chercheur associé du Centre for Research on Globalization, et Thierry Meyssan, président-fondateur du Réseau Voltaire et de la conférence Axis for Peace, sont retranchés dans l’hôtel Rixos autour duquel d’importants combats ont lieu. L’ordre aurait été donné de les abattre.
Thierry Meyssan est à Tripoli depuis le 23 juin dernier. Il y a d’abord dirigé une équipe d’enquêteurs du Réseau Voltaire. Il mène depuis deux mois un travail d’information journalistique sur le conflit. Ses positions se distinguent de celles de ses confrères : il décrit la rébellion comme étant minoritaire et permettant de justifier aux yeux de l’opinion publique internationale une classique opération militaire.
Quelles que soient les positions défendues par Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya et Thierry Meyssan, leur assassinat serait inacceptable. Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya et Thierry Meyssan ne sont pas des combattants, mais des journalistes. Les personnes qui soutiennent cette guerre en pensant qu’elle est menée pour la démocratie et la liberté ne peuvent accepter qu’on assassine des journalistes.
À l’heure actuelle, cinq États leur ont offert leur protection diplomatique. Mais les combats autour de l’hôtel les empêchent de sortir et plusieurs de ces ambassades ont été encerclées afin de rendre tout accès impossible.
Sachant les menaces qui pèsent sur eux, Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya et Thierry Meyssan ne s’exposent pas à des « balles perdues ».
Le Réseau Voltaire appelle les citoyens des pays impliqués dans la guerre à faire pression sur leurs gouvernements afin d’assurer la sécurité de ces journalistes. Il demande à chacun de jouer son rôle de citoyen et de faire circuler cette information.

---

Pour en savoir plus :
Articles de Thierry Meyssan :
http://www.voltairenet.org/_Thierry-Meyssan_?lang=fr
Articles à propos de Thierry Meyssan :
http://www.voltairenet.org/+-Meyssan-Thierry-+?lang=fr
Articles de Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya :
http://www.voltairenet.org/_Mahdi-Darius-Nazemroaya_?lang=fr

Articles du Réseau Voltaire sur la Libye :
http://www.voltairenet.org/+-Libye-+?lang=fr

http://www.alterinfo.net/Tripoli-le-Reseau-Voltaire-s-inquiete-des-menaces-de-mort-qui-pesent-sur-Mahdi-Darius-Nazemroaya-et-Thierry-Meyssan_a62681.html/

End Of An Era: Shaquille O’Neal Says Goodbye To The NBA…

Catch ya later, Diesel.

Shaq took to the social media site, Tout, to put out a video where he announced his retirement.

“We did it. Nineteen years baby,” Shaq shared. “I want to thank you very much, that’s why I’m telling you first, I’m about to retire. Thank you, talk to you soon.”

You think this is really the end or just another prank? Shaq is getting old and could barely walk around for the last half of the season, so maybe it’s best he call it a career. It’s also interesting that he waited until the Finals started, so he can snatch the attention away from the people that are actually still playing ball.

Oh well, at least now he can spend some quality time with his boo boo Hoopz. So what do you think? Is Shaq the greatest NBA center of all time?

Matrimoni Gay: Il 53 % degli americani favorevoli

Cambiano i tempi, cambia la cultura, e soprattutto cambiano i gusti. Così per la prima volta nella storia degli Stati Uniti la maggioranza degli americani si è espressa a favore dei matrimoni gay. Queste informazioni provengono da un attendibile sondaggio condotto dal Washington Post insieme alla Abc, il cui risultato segna un evidente cambiamento in relazione alle libertà sessuali: il 53% dei cittadini statunitensi pensa che la legge dovrebbe consentire agli omossessuali di potere sposarsi.

Un risultato eclatante, considerando che sei anni fa, nel 2004, era favorevole solo il 32% della popolazione. Va però sottolineato che al momento il matrimonio tra persone dello stesso sesso è già legale in cinque stati: Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Vermont, Iowa, Connecticut e nel District of Columbia.